The lunar mission launched by the Chang'e-6 program has made significant contributions to our understanding of the Moon's geology and evolution. Specifically, the samples returned from the far side of the Moon have revealed fascinating insights into the age and composition of the volcanic rocks found there. This article discusses the findings of a team led by Professor Xu Yigang from the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, focusing on the discovery of 2.83-billion-year-old basalt with a depleted mantle source.

The Global Dichotomy of the Moon

The Moon exhibits a distinct dichotomy between its near side and far side, each presenting unique characteristics. The near side is marked by expansive maria or basalt plains, while the far side is dominated by highlands and craters. This variation raises questions about the geological processes that shaped these two hemispheres. Understanding this dichotomy is essential for lunar science and planetary geology.

Chang'e-6 lunar samples reveal 2.83-billion-year-old basalt with depleted mantle source
Landing site of the Chang'e-6 mission on the moon's far side. Credit: GIGCAS

Research Overview and Methodology

Professor Xu's research team analyzed lunar soil samples from the South Pole-Aitken Basin, utilizing various isotopic dating techniques to determine the age of the basaltic rocks. A combination of high-precision Pb-Pb dating of Zr-bearing minerals, alongside Rb-Sr dating of plagioclase, served to yield consistent isochron ages of 2.83 billion years, indicating ongoing volcanic activity on the lunar far side.

Significance of the Study

This investigation is particularly critical because it challenges previous models of lunar geology. The research revealed that the prevailing notion of volcanism being concentrated on the Moon's near side, with the far side being dormant or less active, is inadequate. Instead, ongoing volcanic processes are indeed present on the far side, underscoring the need for reevaluation of the Moon's geological history.

The Composition of Lunar Basalt Samples

Analysis of the lunar samples revealed two primary types of mare basalts: low-titanium (Ti) and very low-titanium (VLT) basalts. The low-Ti basalt characterized the local basaltic unit around the landing site, while the VLT basalt appeared to originate from an adjacent geological unit.

Chang'e-6 lunar samples reveal 2.83-billion-year-old basalt with depleted mantle source
The two types of basalts in Chang'e-6 soils and isochrons of the Chang'e-6 low-Ti basalt. Credit: GIGCAS

Geochemical Analysis Findings

The geochemical analysis determined that the Chang'e-6 low-Ti basalt samples exhibited a low μ value, with a distinct 87Sr/86Sr ratio alongside a very high value of εNd. Such readings suggest that the source of the lunar basalt is exceptionally depleted, providing further context to the Moon's geological evolution.

Lunar Crustal Thickness and Volcanism

Crustal thickness plays a significant role in the patterns of lunar volcanism. Notably, the South Pole-Aitken Basin, despite its thin crust, has displayed little evidence of volcanic activity, which contradicts expectations. Xu's findings imply that the composition of the mantle source, rather than just crustal thickness, is a crucial factor in understanding volcanic activity on the Moon.

Insights Into Lunar Mantle Composition

The investigation highlighted that the mantle beneath the SPA Basin is particularly depleted and refractory, thus limiting the potential for partial melting. These findings enrich our knowledge of the Moon's interior and can potentially offer insights into the broader aspects of planetary geology within our solar system.

Implications of the Research

This research not only sheds light on the Moon's geological history but offers broader implications for planetary science. It suggests the presence of a consistent impact flux post-2.83 billion years, affecting both crater formation models and the evolution of lunar impactors linked to the solar system's early planetary migrations.

Summary of Key Findings

  • Samples from Chang'e-6 show two basalt types: low-Ti and VLT, with distinct source characteristics.
  • Isochron dating measures the basalt's age at 2.83 billion years, indicating past volcanic activity on the Moon's far side.
  • The lunar mantle beneath SPA is refractory and depleted, adding complexity to models of lunar volcanism and crustal evolution.
  • Research findings recalibrate lunar crater chronology, emphasizing ongoing discoveries in planetary geology.
Summary of Findings by Chang'e-6 Mission Team
Findings Details Significance
Age of Basalt 2.83 billion years Indicates volcanic activity on the far side of the moon
Types of Basalts Low-Ti and VLT Basalts Diagnostic for understanding regional geological differences
Isotope Ratios Low μ value; High εNd value Demonstrates a depleted mantle source
Impact Flux Post-2.83 Ga Consistent flux observed Impacts models of lunar crater chronology
Crustal Thickness Insights SPA has a thin crust but minimal volcanism Challenges prior understanding of lunar crust dynamics
“The samples returned by Chang'e-6 provide the best opportunity to investigate the lunar global dichotomy.” – Professor Xu Yigang

Future Directions in Lunar Research

Following the insights gained from the Chang'e-6 mission, further investigations are planned to enhance our understanding of lunar geology. Priority topics include:

  • Comparative analyses of lunar surface samples from previous missions (Apollo and Chang'e-5).
  • Continued isotopic analysis to refine understanding of the Moon's mantle composition.
  • Investigations of the relationship between lunar volcanic activity and crustal features.
  • Assessment of implications for planetary formation and evolution models across the solar system.

Conclusions

The work of Professor Xu and his team marks a significant advancement in lunar science, aiding our understanding of the Moon's evolution and the geological processes that shape it. Investigating samples from the Moon's far side has provided critical data that question conventional knowledge about lunar volcanism and geological history.

For further reading and a deeper dive into the study, readers may explore the following references:

For more information, please refer to the article from Universetoday.

The link has been copied!